Talk:B1A4

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Notability[edit]

Considering this is an article about a Korean band, it may be helpful for people to remember that Wikipedia Korea also has a page for B1A4. Keep up the good work! Snowclrops (talk) 21:06, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Korea is entirely independent of en.Wiki. The English language Wikipedia is also known to practice far more exacting standards than even some of its European counterpats (France for example). Comparing it to the Korean Wiki is unfortunaltely an otherstuff exists rationale. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:44, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

-

My comparison to Wikipedia Korea on the articles for deletion page was part of a comment to suggest why I had confidence that within a short period they'd be notable. It wasn't intended to be an argument which is why I called it a comment and specifically said it wasn't supposed to be proof. Furthermore, I've managed to demonstrate two of the three things I predicted (music show, charting, and variety show) within half a week, a much shorter period of time than I mentioned, so I think it was a justified comment. My reference here is because originally Wikipedia complained when I was going to delete my comment on this page and consequently clear the page. I decided this would be a more productive comment to leave instead. I left it here to remind people that the page is about a Korean subject matter and thus if the page is out of date, it may be very useful to check the Korean page for more information or links since as Korean speakers they may be better informed about the subject matter (even if you can't read it, you can sometimes still pick out stuff). I know that I hadn't considered such resources and thought it may be helpful to someone else on a later date. Snowclrops (talk) 03:09, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
-but only if they assert notability according to WP:GNG and WP:BAND. However, encyclopedias deal with facts - generally things that have already happened. You might fond WP:CRYSTAL and WP:BURDEN interesting. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:54, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'd appreciate it if you don't rewrite over my comments, I consider that very rude, plus it makes it really hard for other readers to realize that the bulk of that passage was written by me and that you just decided to change the last few lines. And quite frankly I don't know what you're talking about. Literally. Recently, I used a page on Wikipedia Korea in order to find the homepage of the band because the English article didn't include it and search engines often seem to ignore foreign sites. Using sources found by other people is a perfectly decent way of finding sources. Snowclrops (talk) 22:18, 25 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(Edit glitsches restored). I'll just mention again that it might be more helpful if you would base your arguments on the inclusion criteria and policies practiced in the English language Wikipedia. Please now read WP:CRYSTAL and WP:BURDEN. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:46, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The idea of an openly editable encyclopedia is to constantly expand it's content into every small but notable part of knowledge and this does that. This type of article shows that Wikipedia goes into every small gaping hole of knowledge and takes it. And I can very much assure you that they will do well as TVXQ because they started small and grew to be one of the biggest in Asia. Remember the one rule in Asian mainstream music: Evey artist gets their limelight. 86.14.37.203 (talk) 16:52, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Actually that idea is a popular misconception. Anyone who has read the founding philosophy of Wikipedia and the rules before posting new articles will know differently. I'm afraid that constantly appealing to our emotions will not help bend those rules. Here's another link for you: Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not. Hope it helps. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 09:11, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Firstly I was not appealing to anyones emotions, secondly if that's what Wikipedia is not then a lot of the articles here are completely irrelevant to Wikipedia's aim and purpose. And there is no misconception unless this isn't an encyclopedia at all, if so then Wikipedia's slogan is wrong is it not? Plus the statement on their "It is not a paper encyclopedia, it is a digital encyclopedia is irrelevant; it's like saying a film camera has no similarities to a digital one, seems like nonsensical talk. peter spering 14:07, 28 April 2011 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pesa123456789 (talk • contribs)
And that's another thing, if your uncooperative and impudent attitude carries on, I shall be making it known to higher powers.peter spering 22:02, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

File:BoneAfour.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:BoneAfour.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:BoneAfour.jpg)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 05:50, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Screenshot of the members from their recent effort "BABY I'M SORRY".png Nominated for speedy Deletion[edit]

An image used in this article, File:Screenshot of the members from their recent effort "BABY I'M SORRY".png, has been nominated for speedy deletion at Wikimedia Commons for the following reason: Copyright violations
What should I do?

Don't panic; deletions can take a little longer at Commons than they do on Wikipedia. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion (although please review Commons guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use)
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Commons Undeletion Request

To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Screenshot of the members from their recent effort "BABY I'M SORRY".png)

This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 16:47, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in B1A4[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of B1A4's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "gaon":

  • From Ignition (B1A4 album): "Gaon Search - B1A4" (in Korean). Gaon. Retrieved 2012-06-14.
  • From Dal Shabet discography: "Gaon Chart Search" (in Korean). Gaon Chart.
  • From Gaon Chart: Seo, Jung-min (February 23, 2010). "대중 음악 공인 '가온 차트' 출범". The Hankyoreh (in Korean). The Hankyoreh. Retrieved October 3, 2010. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |trans_title= ignored (|trans-title= suggested) (help)
  • From Sistar discography: (in Korean) "Gaon Search - Sistar". Gaon. Retrieved 2012-04-11.
  • From Nine Muses discography: "Gaon Monthly Albums Chart" (in Korean). Gaon. Retrieved June 6, 2013.
  • From Beautiful Target: "Gaon Search - B1A4" (in Korean). Gaon. 2012-08-21.
  • From B1A4 discography: (in Korean)"Gaon Chart March 2012 rankings". Gaon Chart. Retrieved April 15, 2012.
  • From Crash (B.A.P song): "Gaon Chart - Search - B.A.P". Korea Music Content Industry Association. Retrieved July 26, 2012.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 09:53, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

CNU (singer) deletion[edit]

Several of us have wondered where CNU's wiki page went. As I have some experience with Wiki I researched the edits and found it had been posted for deletion and a consensus was to remove based on the fact he had NO activities outside B1A4. This is untrue, as he has acting and musical credits.

I would like to request his page be undeleted. If links for verification are needed, those can be provided. He performed as Anatoly in Chess The Musical in Korea just a few months ago (June 19th to July 19th 2015) as his debut into musical acting. It was in many articles including Soompi, Allkpop, etc. He also played on a Korean television drama "I Need A Fairy", http://www.koreandrama.org/i-need-a-fairy/

Please undo his deletion so we may continue to update it with his ongoing individual activities.

Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hjlyon14 (talk • contribs) 00:00, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on B1A4. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:08, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 10 external links on B1A4. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:48, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on B1A4. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:11, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:B1A4&oldid=1205572843"