Talk:Backbreaker

	Backbreaker is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Inverted Headlock Backbreaker[edit]

Anyone else think that this move should be moved elsewhere? It's different from a backbreaker. This move does not cause damage to spine/back it takes out opponents breath much like a lungblower. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Azihade (talk • contribs) 12:50, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Its a backbreaker...the trick is its the illusion that the spine is being inverted backwards suddenly appearing to be hyper extended

Tilt-A-Whirl[edit]

The move is not called a tilt-a-whirl backbreaker. It is called a tilt-the-world backbreaker. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.176.172.179 (talk) 01:45, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Never heard of a tilt-the-world backbreaker. Changed it back. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.112.177.9 (talk) 23:02, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Whoever it is that keeps reverting it to Tilt-The-World in this article and in both Tilt-a-whirl mat slam and Tilt-a-whirl needs to stop until they can show proof it is Tilt-the-World, and not Tilt-a-Whirl which has proof of its correct name in many wrestling video games and magazines. Brody's Ghost (talk) 21:23, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The move is named after the Tilt-a-whirl ride. There's absolutely no basis for the name to be 'Tilt-the-world'. 149.31.177.135 (talk) 20:43, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously, can we do something about this? The same user seems to be intent on keeping it as the wrong term, with no sourcing, and refuses to give any real reason for his edits. It's getting ridiculous and there seems to be no way to stop him from changing it back almost immediately to keep his errant term. 96.225.104.235 (talk) 17:48, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Semi-protection would solve it.TheFBH (talk) 11:37, 20 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]