Talk:Bad Words (film)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Bad Words (film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Mike Christie (talk · contribs) 19:56, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


  • This is more a question than a review comment. I've seen several film articles that include the actor's name in parentheses when their character is first mentioned in the plot summary. Any reason not to do that here? Is there a film style guideline that gives an opinion on this?
  • Has the movie been released to DVD?

-- Images are OK; sources are fine; a spotcheck for close paraphrasing found no problems. Prose is solid and the article seems comprehensive to me. A very clean article. I'll place the article on hold while the questions above are answered, but this is GA quality already. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 20:20, 1 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again, Mike. Regarding your first point, there isn't really an established consensus for in-/excluding actors' names in the plot section (see a recent discussion at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Film#Cast in Plot). There is a cast list in the section below which in my opinion makes actors in the plot summary fairly redundant. Per your second point, I've added a small section about the film's release on DVD, Blu-ray, etc. with the information available. Please let me know if you think there's anything else to be done. Thanks! 97198 (talk) 04:37, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OK on both points; I'm passing the article. Nice work. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 03:26, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! 97198 (talk) 04:33, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bad Words (film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:48, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]