Talk:Badblocks

Computing: Software / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

used for data destruction[edit]

an organization i volunteer with[computer recycler] uses this program to erase donated hard disk drives and test the integrity at the same time. i believe they make four passes, and it works by writing to a sector, then reading back the sector and listening for change. any errors abouve a certain threshold are failed and torn apart for physical destruction...if any more expirenced editors care to add something about this procedure in 99bluefoxx (talk) 17:42, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

disambiguation?[edit]

shouldn't there be a disambiguation page mentiong that "badblocks" may also refer to the actual badblocks and not just some program used in a certain OS to deal with them? --TiagoTiago (talk) 12:31, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, because the bad blocks to which you are referring are actually bad sectors. You could, however, link to that article if it isn't linked in this article already.--86.8.252.7 (talk) 23:53, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

badblocks need to be updated[edit]

1. The number of blocks tested at one time is very small (only 64K) If you increase this to a MB at a time with -c 1024, you can almost double the speed of the badblocks utility.

2. badblocks can't handle disks over 2TB in size.

Wikipedia should mention that.--71.194.190.179 (talk) 18:51, 30 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The 2TB limit is simply the product of

512-byte sectors
32-bit block numbers

Both of these have been resolved in later versions of fsutils.

Martin Kealey (talk) 02:12, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Badblocks. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120719000028/http://www.ukdatarecovery.com/articles/bad-sector-remapping.html to http://www.ukdatarecovery.com/articles/bad-sector-remapping.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:59, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't it a GNU utility?[edit]

The lead says that it's a Linux utility. Isn't it actually a GNU utility? 83.104.249.240 (talk) 01:08, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]