Talk:Badger Army Ammunition Plant

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Badger Army Ammunition Plant article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Firearms Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Firearms, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of firearms on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FirearmsWikipedia:WikiProject FirearmsTemplate:WikiProject FirearmsFirearms articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: Technology / Weaponry / North America / United States / World War II / Cold War Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military science, technology, and theory task force
	Weaponry task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force
	World War II task force
	Cold War task force (c. 1945 – c. 1989)

Wisconsin Low‑importance

	Wisconsin portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wisconsin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Wisconsin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WisconsinWikipedia:WikiProject WisconsinTemplate:WikiProject WisconsinWisconsin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

References Linkage[edit]

I have been going through and trying to tie in my references to the text of the article. If anyone knows a way to clean up the look of the references please do so. After you start cleaning it up, I should get the drift of how to do that and the references process should go much easier. Hopefully I can site all my references. So much comes from memory because I work at Badger and deal with the history every day. But I think I should be able to find independant and verifiable third party articles, reports, and books to back me up. Thanks for all the help so far! Smchase 18:36, 26 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pollution[edit]

Someone needs to add a section about the huge pollution problem and the government refusal to do anything. I would but I have a very bias opinion, so count me out. -- Al™ 00:15, 8 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wonder al (talk · contribs) I agree fully, that "Someone needs to add a section about the huge pollution problem". Do you want to work with me on that? You can edit with WP:NPOV I actually came to do that but a minor edit of mine was reverted by Dual Freq yesterday and criticized, so I think I dont want to go into a hostile environment alone here.

A recent piece of info is from December 5, 2014: Senator Tammy Baldwin Gets the Job Done on Transfer of Badger Army Ammunition Plant - Land Agreement Reached After More Than a Decade of Advocacy.

See also Citizens for Safe Water Around Badger.--Wuerzele (talk) 19:27, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

in teh meanwhile I received a warning by, the following note from Dual Freq "Remediation will probably go on for years there and some fringe parties will never be satisfied with the results. As long as you keep NPOV and don't give fringe groups undue weight, I don't see a problem." - amazing isnt it? --Wuerzele (talk) 04:11, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see a warning in that sentence. Not giving undue weight to fringe groups pro or con is a part of being NPOV. You're clearly looking for a dispute, but I don't understand why. --Dual Freq (talk) 22:00, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Need an update since 2014[edit]

Article states "Demolition of the Army manufacturing infrastructure began in 2004 and is expected to be complete in 2014." Anybody have an update? 15:32, 28 May 2018 (UTC)