Talk:Bagumbayan–VNP

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved for now, per discussion and ArbCom motion. The issue can be revisited once consensus is reached on the guideline. Jafeluv (talk) 09:25, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

La Salle–UST rivalry → La Salle – UST rivalry – I previously moved these pages out of my idiocy of WP:DASH. An en dash should be preceded and followed by spaces if either words that it joins are separated by spaces. Sorry for bringing unnecessary work to the moving admin. Moray An Par (talk) 13:09, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Defer -- whatever comes out of this should be followed, and any moves should be deferred until that discussion is over. –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 13:33, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    We should follow current guidelines. The discussion shows that the current position is unlikely to change. Moray An Par (talk) 14:00, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    Yeah, that's what both sides of the "Dash Wars" said (see Talk:Mexican-American War/Archive 3). It won't hurt if we wait. There's no WP:DEADLINE anyway.
    And if we'd follow the Mexican~American War arguments, the rivalry articles shouldn't have spaces before and after the endashes. Dunno for the other articles, as the dashes there are used differently. –HTD (ITN: Where no updates but is stickied happens.) 14:08, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support: People may disagree about dashes versus hyphens but I don't think the spacing is under much contention. –CWenger (^ • @) 21:29, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Defer Actually, the spacing is contentious, and the entire request should be postponed; some of us do hold the eccentric position that we should try to write in the fashion of actual printed English: Ateneo-La Salle. When this is reopened, this should be divided into three move requests: one for Bagumbayan, which is an effort to add a slogan to the common name of a political party (the independent sources call it Bagumbayan, and the best disambiguator from the city is probably (party)); another the colleges with a town name (if consistency is essential, be consistent with University of California, Davis); and a third for the rivalry between two colleges. These are different semantic functions, and a rational set of titles would use different pointing for each. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 06:15, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Move discussion in progress[edit]

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Bagumbayan–Volunteers for a New Philippines which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RM bot 13:16, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bagumbayan–VNP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:22, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bagumbayan–VNP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:03, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bagumbayan–VNP&oldid=1199350831"