Talk:Baldwin Harbor, New York

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

No such town[edit]

I have lived in Oceanside, NY (one town west of Baldwin) for 31 years, long enough to porve to you that there is no such town. when you are in Baldwin you see signs saying Welcome to Baldwin not Welcome to baldwin Harbor. so there is evidents that Baldwin Harbor is only a section of Baldwin, this article will be redirected to Baldwin, New York immeidatly. MrJanitor1 23:28 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Yes such "town"[edit]

The above statement is entirely incorrect. Neither Baldwin nor Baldwin Harbor are "Towns", both are hamlets (and census-designated places), or in other words, unincorporated areas of the Town of Hempstead. Some hamlets (like Oceanside) have a ZIP code bearing their name, some (like Baldwin Harbor) do not. Signs placed by local groups such as the Chamber of Commerce, HOAs, beautification groups or even Dept. of Transportation Highway signs are not a reliable indicator of correct geography. Subdivision of unincorporated areas in Nassau County is established by the Nassau County Planning Commission. Accurate maps of local communities are available from either the Nassau County Dept. of Assessment or the United States Census Bureau. A detailed explanation of the geographic divisions of New York State can be found here. --Nymetropolitans (talk) 07:27, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

The Town of Hempstead does NOT recognize Baldwin Harbor as a hamlet - See this. The Town considers it part of the hamlet of Baldwin. The US Census Bureau has split the area into 2 CDPs. The following places are also not recognized as hamlets:

  • North Woodmere - enclave - -
  • East Garden City - CDP - -
  • Lakeview - CDP - -
  • Malverne Park Oaks - CDP - -
  • North Lynbrook - CDP - -
  • North Wantagh - CDP --JimWae (talk) 23:03, 9 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Baldwin Harbor, New York. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:20, 24 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]