Talk:Bamberg, South Carolina

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

City or town?[edit]

Bamberg is a political subdivision of South Carolina. The database of the Municipal Association of South Carolina lists it as a city. The official website of the Bamber shows the address as City of Bamberg, 2340 Main Highway, Bamberberg, SC.

The US census database shows Bamberg as a town. This creates a discrepancy.

I consider that the first two references (MASC database and official website) add up to a more reliable result that the municipality is a city, not a town. While the census database should generally be considered reliable, it is possible that it is in error.

One editor took the difference between two sources to mean that there was some official change from a town to a city that occurred after the 2000 census. This conclusion clearly goes against Wikipedia:No original research. I am reverting that edit and requesting discussion here.

The history page on the official website does use both of the words, town and city. It says things like "the incorporated area of the city of Bamberg" and "the town incorporated when … " This could be an indication that the municipality changed from a town to a city at some point. However, it does not provide sufficient information to determine it this is truly the case, nor when it occurred. - ¢Spender1983 (talk) 19:01, 18 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notable people section[edit]

I removed Williams "Beez Kneez" Bessinger from this section because he does not have a Wikipedia article which is required to establish notability. This ist he information I removed, "Williams "Beez Kneez" Bessinger aka "The Bamberg Flash" - Winner of the Mr. Bamberg Pageant 1961, Professional Table Anchor."

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Bamberg, South Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:52, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Bamberg, South Carolina. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:48, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]