Talk:Banu Muhriz

A fact from Banu Muhriz appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 December 2020 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Banu Muhriz emirs were patrons of the Alawites of Syria?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2020/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Banu Muhriz.

Wikipedia

Syria Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SyriaWikipedia:WikiProject SyriaTemplate:WikiProject SyriaSyria articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination[edit]

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 02:12, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the Banu Muhriz emirs were patrons of the Alawites of Syria? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)

Reviewed: Giuseppe Furlani

Created by Al Ameer son (talk). Self-nominated at 05:15, 25 November 2020 (UTC).[reply]

General: Article is new enough and long enough
New enough: Long enough:

Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Adequate sourcing: Neutral: Free of copyright violations, plagiarism, and close paraphrasing:

Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Cited: Interesting:

QPQ: Done.

Overall: The article is interesting, newly created, well sourced and neutral. Assuming good faith for Deschamp source (offline). The hook is not cited. Pending QPQ review. ~ Elias Z. (talkallam) 13:25, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Elias Ziade: Just cited the hook directly in the article. If necessary, I could modify “Syria” to “Syrian coastal mountains” or drop Syria altogether. QPQ is done as well. Al Ameer (talk) 15:44, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clarification. I don't believe it's necessary to change anything. ~ Elias Z. (talkallam) 12:13, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The hook fact is sourced to Winter, not Deschamp. Yoninah (talk) 02:12, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]