This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article was created or improved during the #1day1woman initiative hosted by the Women in Red project in 2022. The editor(s) involved may be new; please assume good faith regarding their contributions before making changes.Women in RedWikipedia:WikiProject Women in RedTemplate:WikiProject Women in RedWomen in Red articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
A fact from Barbara Maier Gustern appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 April 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
@SusunW: Can you tell if this image now in the public domain [1]? I couldn't find the copyright notice. TJMSmith (talk) 12:17, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
TJMSmith I think you are good to use it. Copyright law indicates between 1927 and 1977 published without a notice is in the public domain. Neither the masthead, nor publishing data contain a copyright indication. To be doubly safe, I checked the Catalog of Copyright Entries and nothing for Evansville. SusunW (talk) 13:54, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
SusunW Thank you! What is the template I should use in Commons? TJMSmith (talk) 14:08, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Found it! PD-US-no notice TJMSmith (talk) 14:54, 16 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Why does the intro say Barbara Joan Maier Gustern (née Maier) ... with the "Maier" name being repeated? The fact that it is included in her FULL NAME -- the first one listed -- indicates that "Maier" is her maiden name ... and thus makes the "née" notation redundant or unnecessary ... no? Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 18:36, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm only a sporadic reader here, and yet, I have read many times here of the rule whereby nobody becomes notable based on being a one-time crime victim. I guess that's just another of the phony WP rules and guidelines, which only apply when they are expedient for the person wielding them. 2603:7000:B23E:3056:C884:B510:DE1E:181F (talk) 03:15, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think that rules applies and if she had not coached Debbie Harry then its unquestionable. My concern here is that the person who is changed with manslaughter is being judged here on Wikipedia. This would be illegal in the UK. She was allegedly pushed by an unknown person and a woman has been charged with manslaughter (not murder). Victuallers (talk) 09:39, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Re: Barbara Maier Gustern's date of birth. Is this a reliable source? [3] - Singing teacher to the stars turns 85 with a little help from Debbie Harry. It was published on February 4, 2020. It states: "The singing teacher turns 85 on Monday". February 4, 2020, was a Tuesday. The "following Monday" would have been Monday, February 10, 2020. If her 85th birthday was on February 10, 2020, ... then, she was born 85 years earlier ... and, thus, her date of birth is February 10, 1935. So, is this (The New York Post) a reliable source? Thanks. Joseph A. Spadaro (talk) 02:47, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
