Talk:Barnell Bohusk

This page was proposed for deletion by TTN (talk · contribs) on 9 March 2020.

Comics: Marvel Low‑importance

	Comics portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by Marvel Comics work group.

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Exiles[edit]

The info under the illustration claims Beak to be still a member of the Exiles. I don't know if that is correct. Luis Dantas 12:21, 20 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Exiles, Part 2[edit]

I thought the Exiles were reality-hoppers, not time-travellers. Mishy dishy 23:10, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yep. Even when they've gone to events that were considered to be in the past (Death of Phoenix, for example), it was explained that the timeline was just going a bit slower. I switched it over to reality hopping. Deafgeek 11:28, 16 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV[edit]

There's a lot of things in here that need cleaning up. Two examples that come to mind are "Scarlet Witch's crazy" and the discussion of the legitamacy of his name. I'm hoping to do some work on this later myself, when I'm not stuck at work. Deafgeek 15:29, 15 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Newxmen125.jpg[edit]

Image:Newxmen125.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 22:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Zombie Beak?[edit]

The Warren Worthington page indicates there is a Marvel Zombies version of Beak. Noteable if true. Lots42 (talk) 04:33, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Exiles[edit]

An issue of Exiles I stumbled across indicates Beak spent some time imprisoned with the injured and the dead in the 'Crystal Palace'. Why or how he got out was not explained. Noteable? Yes. Lots42 (talk) 16:09, 11 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge proposal[edit]

The Tito Jerome Bohusk article is a stub that is unlikely to expand because the character is from an alternate future and is therefore unlikely to return. (In the rare event that he does return and merits his own article the articles can be unmerged at that point in time.) He is basically just an alternative version of Barnell Bohusk and should be merged completely into the "Here Comes Tomorrow" section of the "Other versions" section. Everything that is in the Tito Jerome Bohusk article could be easily put into that section and it wouldn't make the section too large. The Tito Bohusk article is even less notable and could mostly be deleted, but the remaining information placed here. Spidey104 15:59, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I support the merge. Kurt Parker (talk) 18:51, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. I agree with the arguments.--Crazy runner (talk) 06:45, 5 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Barnell Bohusk. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060523194359/http://www.uncannyxmen.net/db/characters/showquestion.asp?fldAuto=1243 to http://www.uncannyxmen.net/db/characters/showquestion.asp?fldAuto=1243

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:38, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]