Talk:Barracuda Lounge/GA1

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: PinkElixir (talk · contribs) 02:37, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

I am planning to review this article, and will do so in the coming days. Kind regards, PinkElixir (talk) 02:37, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Hi, PinkElixir, and thank you for taking on this review! Armadillopteryx 03:08, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	There are no spelling or grammar mistakes. The writing is clear, succinct, and easy to understand for a general audience.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	The lead section captures a summary of the article and follows WP:NPOV.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	All information is sourced.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	Information is sourced using appropriate WP:RS.
	2c. it contains no original research.	There is no WP:OR.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	There are no signs of WP:PLAG or WP:CV.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	The article focuses on relevant main aspects of the topic, such as its history, cultural significance, and COVID-related operational changes.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	The article is appropriately sized for the amount of information available on the lounge.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	The article follows NPOV.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	There is no history of edit warring or content dispute on the article.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	Images are appropriately used.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	Images and captions are relevant to the topic.
	7. Overall assessment.	Y - article passes GA criteria

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.