Talk:Batalik

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

India: Jammu and Kashmir / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Jammu and Kashmir (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Interesting place[edit]

The British Raj era maps don't show the Batalik village. Instead, they have a village called "Dumgul" or "Dumgal" in its place. Trying to find out how Batalik came into being, I ran into the fact that it was military base established in the 1960s.

According to Wikimapia, Dumgul still exists. It is lower down at the river level. Between Batalik and Dumgul, there is another level called "Yogmathang" ("Lower Plain"). Google satellite imagery showing all three levels.

FYI, TrangaBellam. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 01:24, 29 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There should be two web pages ,one should be batalik village and another should be batalik sector . The batalik sector is a military reference which is very big area,on the other hand the batalik village is a very small village of few house . 106.205.128.179 (talk) 09:58, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]