Talk:Battle for Bittora

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

there is a movie by this title and a book. there might need to be disambiguation. ForbiddenRocky (talk) 18:48, 10 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Suggestion for Renaming the novel and movie pages[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Battle for Bittora turned into a dab, history that used to be located there and was merged to Battle for Bittora (film) is now located at Battle For Bittora (film). Jenks24 (talk) 11:13, 23 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

– Is clearer than what is happening now. ForbiddenRocky (talk) 03:42, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest you change the second proposal to Battle for Bittora (film). We don't disambiguate with (movie). --BDD (talk) 14:49, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Done. ForbiddenRocky (talk) 17:04, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom, though per MOS, use Battle for Bittora (film) instead -- 70.51.202.183 (talk) 05:38, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- On second thought, move Battle For Bittora to Battle for Bittora (film), and merge Battle for Bittora to that article, since the "For" article is older and longer. -- 70.51.202.183 (talk) 05:41, 12 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - I think I know what you mean, but could you restate your idea just to be clear? Also, could link a similar situation so I could consider what's your proposal? ForbiddenRocky (talk) 13:46, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - Merge Battle for Bittora into -> Battle For Bittora
    - Move Battle For Bittora to -> Battle for Bittora (film)
    - Does that make it clearer ? -- 70.51.202.183 (talk) 07:16, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
BTW, as proposer, Support ForbiddenRocky (talk) 13:46, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Since the film did not require a RM, I went ahead and moved it per WP:NCF. IMO, the novel already has sufficient disambiguation as is. Fortdj33 (talk) 13:23, 15 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 7 February 2017[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Ultimately unopposed after a couple of weeks. Jenks24 (talk) 14:42, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Battle for Bittora (novel) → Battle for Bittora – Only one article with this name, so parenthetical disambiguation is not needed. This article would remain the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC even if an article is later created for the film, because the film is based on the novel. — Gorthian (talk) 00:18, 7 February 2017 (UTC) Relisted. Jenks24 (talk) 09:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - honestly can't see there's a rush here, it's highly probably that the film will go ahead and an article will be created even if the name changes http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/work-on-battle-for-bittora-has-started-sonam-kapoor-3105095/ In ictu oculi (talk) 09:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- No rush intended or needed. — Gorthian (talk) 03:52, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.