Talk:Battle of Cape Finisterre (1805)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Cape Finisterre (1805) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: Maritime / British / European / French / Spanish / Napoleonic era C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	Spanish military history task force
	Napoleonic era task force (c. 1792 – 1815)

Result[edit]

This edit war is ridiculous. The entry in the infobox concerning the result has gotten to the point where it should just be removed. Frankly if you can't summarise it, then leave it out and put it in the article under the Aftermath section. Centy – reply• contribs – 04:34, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If I understand you, a thoroughly-cited result should be removed because a well-known vandal keeps tampering with it while never producing a single source? Albrecht (talk) 14:33, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A thoroughly-cited result should be discussed in detail in the article and not make the infobox look ridiculous. Put one citation in the infobox or something like that and then the rest in the article. Or even better, take my suggestion and remove it from the infobox. Actually make readers read the aftermath to allow them to make their own conclusions rather than just give them a one word summary: Britain won/France won etc. Centy – reply• contribs – 10:15, 16 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]