Talk:Battle of Douvres Radar Station

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Douvres Radar Station article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Military history: British / European / German / World War II

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	British military history task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	World War II task force

France Low‑importance

	France portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject France, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of France on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FranceWikipedia:WikiProject FranceTemplate:WikiProject FranceFrance articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Normandy Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Normandy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Normandy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NormandyWikipedia:WikiProject NormandyTemplate:WikiProject NormandyNormandy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The New Sections (3+1) February 2018.[edit]

As you may note I added Three Sections last week, thinking their facts are valuable, adding to the article ... and I placed them at the End of The Article. Sitting at the end of the article, they could be attractive to someone 'with a real interest' in the subject, not taking away from the Story of the Battle: The Assault and 41 RM Cdo.

A little detailed ... I was going to clean them a little, confirming a couple of facts, needing a second reference (which I have) and adding some clarity to a few details. And modifying the format in two sections ... to reduce the indents. This week I added a fourth Section: D+1 ... as a Bridge/ Lead-in to the Assault Section. And I added a 'last' paragraph in Background to tie the 3+1 New Sections together.

Would it be possible to consider 'REreformatting' and putting the x3 Sections: The Objective / The Radars (thanks for the image) / The Defenders at the end of the Article? I would then 'clean' them up ... and you could decide what to do, keep it as it might be set-out or have a very big 'Background'?

I am not 'experienced' enough to comment on Sections with (Big) Subsections, Thanks for the Consideration. KWS PEI 17.Feb.2018 — Preceding unsigned comment added by KWS PEI (talk • contribs) 22:21, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Notes Section March 2018[edit]

As you will note the change I requested above was made and I have begun to edit the Three Notes 'now' at the bottom of the Article. I have cleaned somewhat The Objective, looking for a couple more links, and have additional detail to add to The Radars and The Defenders.

I will try an automatic signature this time? KWS PEI 00:37, 18 March 2018 (UTC)

'Black Watch, 5th Battalion, Royal Regiment of Scotland'[edit]

With respect, unless this refers to a Canadian unit of which I am unaware, The Royal Regiment of Scotland only came into being in 2006.

I assume the unit in question was the 5th Battalion, The Black Watch, a British territorial unit that formed part of the 51st Highland Division.

JF42 (talk) 09:41, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Vollfestungsmäßig Groß Suchstellung"[edit]

The term barely makes any sense, it's certainly not standard German. Is the term overwhelmingly used in English-language literature? In this case it wouldn't be a German term at all, and everything goes.

Otherwise it should be fixed. Unfortunately, as I said it barely makes any sense, so there is no obvious fix. Maybe "vollfestungsmäßige große Suchstellung", but even that would be an awkward term. --84.132.148.245 (talk) 14:26, 8 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]