Talk:Battle of Grunwald/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: mark nutley (talk) 21:01, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Passed quick-fail check. mark nutley (talk) 18:23, 20 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
Is this review is over or not?? M.K. (talk) 04:40, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
No i am still working on it but time has been short, i shall finish it tonight mark nutley (talk) 06:44, 25 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]