Talk:Bears and Man

A fact from Bears and Man appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 February 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that, while filming the 1978 documentary Bears and Man, director Bill Schmalz witnessed a grizzly bear maul a Parks Canada game warden to death?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/February. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Bears and Man.

Wikipedia

Film: Canadian / Documentary

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Canadian cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.

Canada Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Studio vs. Production Compnay/Agency in the Infobox[edit]

Continuing the discussion at Template:Did you know nominations/Bears and Man. The entity "Wilderness Cinegraphic" was removed from the infobox "studio" field, on the grounds that it is not an established studio. While I agree with this, and can't offer any illumination as to the exact nature of W.C., I believe it should be included in the infobox as a "statement of responsibility" (see Cataloging), i.e. a potential search term for someone searching the topic. The NFB have given credit to this entity, so I think we should as well. From my experience in the film world, it's likely this is a personal company for Schmalz, and may not have even had an office. However, we do list these "personal" production companies as "studios" in practice, for instance "A Band Apart" is Quentin Tarantino's personal outfit, but gets billing alongside Miramax in the studio field in his articles (see Inglourious Basterds). So, we can simply include it here, talk to WikiProject Film about getting the "studio" parameter either expanded to include production companies, or strictly limited to proper "studios" (that might be difficult as I don't know of a proper definition), or exclude it. The Interior (Talk) 04:51, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I put it back, then. Like I'd said, I'd have no objection to you simply reverting. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:55, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]