This article is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is written in Canadian English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, centre, travelled, realize, analyze) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.
The article says that the electorate existed since 1867. When I check the sources, it appears that the Parliament of Canada website has the history of federal ridings from 1867 onwards online. When I look at the 1st and 2nd Parliament of the Province of Canada articles (covering 1841 to 1847), Beauharnois is listed as one of the electoral districts. So could it be that the article states something that isn't in fact true, simply because info from a particular year onwards is online? Schwede66 21:53, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The first sentence of the article states that it is about an electoral district for the Canadian House of Commons, abody that was created in 1867. The previous Beauharnois was for a different assembly. Could we mention that there was an electoral district with the same name in the Legislative Assembly of the Province of Canada? Sure. Ground Zero | t 22:28, 2 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the response. I think that is a good idea, because it may help ignorant people like me with not making mistakes with succession boxes. I note that the succession box links to this electorate, and if the intention is that the previous electorate gets its own article eventually, it might pay to set up a redirect that points here for the time being. Schwede66 00:14, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I can't imagine that pre-Confederation electoral districts will get their own articles -- there would be darn few readily available sources for such information. Ground Zero | t 00:28, 4 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
