Talk:Beit Wazan

Warning: active arbitration remedies

The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article is related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, which is a contentious topic. Furthermore, the following rules apply when editing this article:

You must be logged-in and extended-confirmed to edit or discuss this topic on any page (except for making edit requests, provided they are not disruptive)
You may not make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any edits related to this topic

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Further information

The exceptions to the extended confirmed restriction are:

Non-extended-confirmed editors may use the "Talk:" namespace only to make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive.
Non-extended-confirmed editors may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles created by non-extended-confirmed editors is permitted but not required.

With respect to the WP:1RR restriction:

Clear vandalism of whatever origin may be reverted without restriction. Also, reverts made solely to enforce the extended confirmed restriction are not considered edit warring.
Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.

After being warned, contentious topics procedure can be used against any editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process. Contentious topic sanctions can include blocks, topic-bans, or other restrictions.
Editors may report violations of these restrictions to the Arbitration enforcement noticeboard.

If you are unsure if your edit is appropriate, discuss it here on this talk page first. When in doubt, don't revert!

A fact from Beit Wazan appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 10 July 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Qasim al-Ahmad, from the fortified village of Beit Wazan, led the 1834 Peasants' Revolt in Palestine against Ibrahim Pasha of Egypt?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2015/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Qasim al-Ahmad, Beit Wazan.

Wikipedia

Palestine Mid‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

DYK?[edit]

@Al Ameer son: Shall we nominate this for DYK? Huldra (talk) 22:55, 24 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Huldra: Already did. It's packaged with Qasim al-Ahmad. --Al Ameer (talk) 01:20, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Al Ameer son: Great, I did not see that. I wonder though, should we divide it into the same sections as used in the last West Bank DYK, Burqin? Then I could add all the 1945 data, not only the population. I could add the 1961 data, too. Huldra (talk) 20:45, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Normally, I think any modern-era population stats should be included in a Demographics section. However, go ahead and add any other data you have for 1945 and 1961 into the "Modern era" subsection for "History". I'll organize it accordingly. --Al Ameer (talk) 21:34, 25 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What about arranging it in like in Burqin, with a British Mandate era, Jordanian, and Israeli (post-1967)-sections? Huldra (talk) 21:40, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I don't support the set-up in Burqin because the content in each of those subsections is much too small to warrant a separate heading. The British, Jordanian and Israeli periods are all unique eras, but ultimately the volume of material should determine whether or not each of those eras gets their own section. In Burqin, for example, the Israeli and Jordanian periods only have two sentences general to the entire West Bank between them. If and when the material we have on these eras is fleshed out (i.e. a full passage or two), then I would support creating more specific subsections. Until then, I think "Modern era" or "Contemporary period" would be more suitable.--Al Ameer (talk) 23:01, 26 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Beit Wazan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140503192113/http://www.riwaq.org/2010/files/Throne_villages.pdf to http://www.riwaq.org/2010/files/Throne_villages.pdf
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.pcbs.gov.ps/Portals/_pcbs/phc_97/nab_t6.aspx

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:49, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]