Talk:Bell UH-1Y Venom

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Bell UH-1Y Venom article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1

This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Aviation: Rotorcraft C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

C

This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the rotorcraft project.

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Number of vehicles in service[edit]

The article states that 31 are in service, but that was in back in 2010. Can anyone update that statistic? Coolgeek96 (talk) 23:49, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Just updated to 54 in use from Aviation Week's 2014 source book. -Fnlayson (talk) 00:19, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Can someone with adequate sources please update again? Nearly 6 years passed since this. Thanks, DPdH (talk) 19:46, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Did you check the article? The numbers in service is not listed in the article; probably removed by another editor that thinks that info is fluff or something. -Fnlayson (talk) 20:18, 29 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The infobox says Number built 92, but the ref is 2015. This can certainly be updated, but we need a newer ref! - Ahunt (talk) 15:08, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

World Air Forces 2020 lists 140 UH-1Ys, but I have difficulty getting the PDF address on from my tablet.

@DPdH: {{update inline}} exists for requesting updates to a specific item in a sentence, line, Infobox, etc. - BilCat (talk) 01:06, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@BilCat: Didn't know, thanks! DPdH (talk) 04:26, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Just note that the total number in service is not the same as the number built (no. built > no. in service). There may be prototypes and test aircraft that are not put into operational service, along with aircraft lost in crashes. -Fnlayson (talk) 01:13, 1 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Crew count[edit]

The crew number under specifications indicate 2 (the pilot and co-pilot), but all Marine Corps utility helicopters fly with a Crew Chief. Would it be appropriate to include the Crew Chief as part of the crew? LokenAkhanteros (talk) 15:06, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

That is listing what the crew that are required for flight, not necessarily the full mission crew. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:10, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This doesn't stay consistent with other aircraft articles, such as the Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey and Sikorsky CH-53K King Stallion which does specify other mission crew members. LokenAkhanteros (talk) 15:16, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I only gave a reason why it is like it is now. I am not finding any sources currently cited in article that list 3 or 4 crew members now. The Navy Fact File lists 12: pilot and co-pilot, crew chief, gunner and eight troops. But other sources in the article only list pilot and co-pilot. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:41, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I believe the fact file to be the most reliable source of information about this anyway - The 8 marines listed would better fit in cargo specifications, and gunners are optional, but the Crew Chief is a permanent member of a Venom Crew, no matter the mission. I think it should be included in the crew count. LokenAkhanteros (talk) 15:45, 10 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I feel other source(s) are needed for only flight crew (excluding troop passengers) so this does not get into original research territory. But I won't argue if someone else updates it. -Fnlayson (talk) 15:36, 18 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]