Talk:Bella Vista railway station

Australia: Sydney / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Bella Vista railway station is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Sydney (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Trains: Stations Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bella Vista railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150917165629/http://sydneymetro.info/project-overview1/documents/23035/download to http://sydneymetro.info/project-overview1/documents/23035/download

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:00, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aligning Services section[edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I am trying to align the Services section below the infobox so that the External image box is included within the Services section and not pushed further down in the article, by using the clear template. While this works, the contents box on the left hand side is also pushed below the infobox which creates unnecessary white space on the page and does not look good. How can I achieve aligning the Services section below the Infobox without the Contents box also being pushed down? Fleet Lists (talk) 04:43, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It looks like using the template {{clear left}} does what you want. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:03, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmcgnh: I had tried that previously and have again included the "left" but it causes the External image box to be shown well below the Services section which is what is not desirable.Fleet Lists (talk) 05:17, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmcgnh: I think I can resolve the problem by splitting the article lead by including most of it in a History section which slots in below the contents box and the just use the clear template.Fleet Lists (talk) 05:27, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fleet Lists, Sure, I may have misunderstood what your goal was with that External image box. You have to remember that the formatting of articles is supposed to be pretty fluid, given all the different browsers and window sizes that may be in use.

If you wanted to more directly connect the infobox and the external image, you might consider a <div> directive around the two. I'm not sure what else that would do, but it's something to try if you have layout goals that aren't being met by the standard layout. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:43, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Jmcgnh: Thanks for that but I have since found out that placing __TOC__ before the clear template would have solved the problem. This forces the table of contents to go where you want it instead of just before the first heading which is standard.Fleet Lists (talk) 12:17, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]