Talk:Bermuda II Agreement

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Politics of the United Kingdom Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles

Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

More information:
/
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Aviation

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

International relations Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Overseas Territories?[edit]

There is no mention of the Bermuda II regarding UK Overseas Territories. Can someone in the know update this please? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.255.56.250 (talk) 03:32, 19 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced tag[edit]

Is this list correct? I've flown directly from Gatwick to Houston which isn't in here. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.2.85.153 (talk • contribs)

This is the list of restrictive airports that can be flown from Heathrow, any destination may be flown from Gatwick but a few of these on the list are restricted only to Heathrow, that is what those remarks mean. -- SmthManly / ^ManlyTalk / ^{ManlyContribs} 04:00, 2 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

First bullet-point reference to third-country airlines[edit]

Does Bermuda II actually make any reference to the rights of third-country carriers? For example, services by Air New Zealand are subject to two sets of air services/transportation arrangements: that negotiated between New Zealand and the United States (since 2001 the "open skies" MALIAT); and separately the 2005 "open skies" bilateral agreement between New Zealand and the United Kingdom - and the necessary fifth freedom rights New Zealand has obtained under those two sets of arrangements. I would not expect Bermuda II to be directly relevant to, or govern the operations of, third-country carriers serving the UK-US air routes.

John Macilree 19:10, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fifth freedom airlines[edit]

The wording "The latter's US traffic rights were withdrawn in the aftermath of the 1979 Iranian hostage crisis. does not make it clear whether it was Kuwait or Iran Air that was withdrawn. Explicitly stating the airline name in this sentence would solve the issue. —Sladen (talk) 19:52, 11 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Virgin?[edit]

How could Virgin have been one of the UK's designated airlines? Virgin didn't exist in 1977. Grover cleveland (talk) 06:43, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bermuda II Agreement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080912161555/http://ec.europa.eu/transport/air_portal/international/pillars/global_partners/doc/us/council_conclusions_22_03_2007.pdf to http://ec.europa.eu/transport/air_portal/international/pillars/global_partners/doc/us/council_conclusions_22_03_2007.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:33, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bermuda II Agreement. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110724230916/http://www.airspacelaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/bermudaII.pdf to http://www.airspacelaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/bermudaII.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:40, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]