Talk:Big Bad/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Untitled

I think the description for Adam should be revised: "Emotionless in tendency and personality, Adam is originally a loyal operative of the Initiative. After being completed, Adam promptly kills Professor Walsh..." This doesn't make sense - exactly when is he loyal, if he kills his creator as soon as he is able to move?


I'm not sure this list of 'Big Bads' is accurate: aren't the Big Bads the series of people seen in episode 7-01? In which case, the Big Bads would be: The Master, Drusilla, Mayor Richard Wilkins III, Adam, Glory, Warren, The First Evil. Any other list isn't really canonical.--Firsfron 02:35, 16 July 2005 (UTC)

The only part I don't agree with on that is that Angel is more the 'Big Bad' of Season Two then Drusilla is.

Spike is also more the S2 big bad than Dru. Also, The real Big Bad of S6 is real life.

I would say Spike and Dru don't really qualify at all; they're only really there to serve as a threat until Angel comes along, after which neither Spike or Dru really give Buffy much trouble. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.17.53.21 (talk) 16:50, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Term used in Buffy

"Big bad" is not used in Buffy to refer to the "major recurring adversary". It is used in Buffy fandom to refer to such. In the show itself, it is used mainly by Spike to refer to himself, a play on "big bad wolf". Other characters use it to refer to whatever enemy they are currently facing.

The opening paragraphs certainly don't make a very good case for the phrase appearing in Buffy. The text refers to two occasions where the words 'big' and 'bad' appeared next to each other, but in neither instance was it a reference to a 'big bad' in the sense that fandom understands the phrase, where 'big' is the adjective and 'bad' is the object. "Big bad thing in the dark" doesn't fit the usage, and neither does Buffy's description of a symbol as "not a big bad". 'Big bad' is a recognisable concept, but these aren't examples of it. 99.242.7.29 (talk) 21:37, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

To help make this article more sensible, please refer to the instances of 'big bad' in dialogue. Aknyra (talk) 22:57, 27 January 2011 (UTC)

Fancruft?

Just wondering, not crusading. 151.197.27.145 07:27, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

The individual season descriptions don't add anything to the article IMO. 4.245.107.157 (talk) 01:43, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:S216 Angelus.png

The image File:S216 Angelus.png is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
  • That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --19:46, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Big Bad. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:28, 19 July 2017 (UTC)