Talk:Blathur

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Blathur article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article was nominated for deletion on 11 June 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was speedy .

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 February 2008. The result of the discussion was keep.

India: Kerala / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Kerala (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Feb 2008[edit]

Well it survived AfD but we still know nothing about the place. I've gone back to all we know, which is the info box. "Article" is indeed on life support. Travellingcari (talk) 18:54, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The sole reference listed on the page now lead to a parking site. There are now no references on this page, and this page no longer meets notability as per consensus on discussion of general notability of geographic locations at village pump. Crickel (talk) 19:11, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AGreed, however it survived AfD on the grounds that it's populated and therefore notable. That said, I don't think we're losing anything if this article is eventually deleted. StarM 01:58, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That AfD was a year ago, when the proposal that all geographic locations with population were 'inherently' notable. It is appropriate to keep pages where a policy proposal that would affect their status is being debated upon. That proposal, however, failed to reach a consensus, and as such, this article should fall under the general Notability guidelines. With no independent references, this article cannot be considered notable. Crickel (talk) 00:16, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion[edit]

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Blathur Juma Masjid.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 08:06, 7 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]