Talk:Bleeding Cool

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tone[edit]

This page reads like it was written by the owner of the website in question.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.184.151.247 (talkcontribs) 08:44, May 8, 2019 (UTC)

Inaccurate Claims[edit]

The sentence "Bleeding Cool has a reputation within the industry for breaking news and bringing to light previously unreported scandal" is blatantly untrue. Bleeding Cool's reputation is for poor writing, worse editing and a lack of focus on shows readers actually watch. Under its current leadership, it's become the laughing stock of the geek world--a British AICN. Most of its writers can't string a sentence together, and few of them have any grasp of basic grammar or punctuation. The site's reputation isn't for breaking news--it's for being broken.

There are two citations supporting that statement. If you think we should include additional information about other aspects of its reputation, we need cited reliable sources for it. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 17:48, 14 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]