Talk:Bloglines

This article was nominated for deletion on March 2, 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Untitled[edit]

Does anyone have a screenshot of the old Bloglines interface? Everdred 13:57, 11 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Folksonomy[edit]

What relation does Bloglines have to the phenomenon of folksonomy? I don't see the logic to that "See also" link. --mtz206 03:24, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Page Down[edit]

Appears that the Bloglines.com site is down for upgrades. I find it rather odd that it is down in the middle of the day. I can't read my news for the day. Wonder if it site upgrade or tech problem?--buzlink 20:11, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note that Wikipedia talk pages are there to discuss about the articles of the topics, and not to talk about the topics themselves. Regardless, bloglines is back up. enderminh 03:45, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, that is correct. So we shouldn't really mention that Bloglines has been practically comatose for the last 5 or more days. e.g. Showing a page/site update about 4 days later, if you are lucky! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.154.146.124 (talk) 08:41, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The site is supposedly down for 'maintenance' - for 10-24 hours??? Looks like the end is nigh according to TechCrunch[1] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.154.141.14 (talk) 20:32, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Bloglines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080212074441/http://www.bloglines.com:80/services/api to http://www.bloglines.com/services/api/
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050507082836/http://www.bloglines.com:80/ to http://www.bloglines.com
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070819035044/http://beta.bloglines.com:80/ to http://beta.bloglines.com
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070724151604/https://i.bloglines.com/ to http://i.bloglines.com

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:32, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Bloglines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bloglines.com/services/api/
Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.bloglines.com/about/pr_02082005
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130118065829/http://www.reply.com/About/PressReleases/corporate_press_2011_5_26.aspx to http://www.reply.com/About/PressReleases/corporate_press_2011_5_26.aspx
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110610173424/http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=3494141 to http://searchenginewatch.com/showPage.html?page=3494141
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100721040737/http://www.businessweek.com/technology/bestof/editorpicks.htm to http://www.businessweek.com/technology/bestof/editorpicks.htm
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.bloglines.com/
Corrected formatting/usage for http://beta.bloglines.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:03, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]