Talk:Bloodshot (comics)

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by United States comics work group.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Cleanup and Wikifying[edit]

Wikifying is complete as far as the state of the current revision allows. The synopsis needs to be better, and more information needs to be added regarding the various Bloodshot series and the differences between them, as well as appearances in other Valiant/Acclaim books. MSJapan 06:48, 27 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

But it still needs to be more NPOV. -- Beardo 06:43, 14 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it was obviously written by a fan, but it reads like someone trying to sell the character. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.222.94.132 (talk) 21:13, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bloodshot 01-00.jpg[edit]

Image:Bloodshot 01-00.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:47, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bloodshotvol201.jpg[edit]

Image:Bloodshotvol201.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bloodshot #0 Platinum[edit]

It should be the Bloodshot #0 Platinum error edition that is extremely rare. There are many copies of the regular edition of Bloodshot #0 Platinum.

See the following webpage: http://www.valiantfan.com/valiant/b0platinum.asp

107.7.27.94 (talk) 23:27, 16 January 2012 (UTC)AvidBloodshotFan[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Bloodshot (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090429111431/http://wiki.valiantentertainment.com:80/index.php/Bloodshot to http://wiki.valiantentertainment.com/index.php/Bloodshot

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:25, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]