Talk:Bloodshot / Waste

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fair use rationale for File:Dove Cameron Bloodshot-Waste.jpeg[edit]

File:Dove Cameron Bloodshot-Waste.jpeg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a non-free use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

-- Marchjuly (talk) 04:32, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

How is this an EP?[edit]

This is literally just two singles, as stated by the sources. Billiekhalidfan (talk) 16:51, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Playbill calls it an EP here. EPs don't always have to have a minimum of tracks, regardless of what extended play says. That's just speaking generally. It could be interpreted as a double A-side single, but that's up to a discussion to determine. Ss112 02:09, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It might be an EP. I only think otherwise because the title is literally the two song titles separated by a dash. Billiekhalidfan (talk) 04:47, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Billiekhalidfan: A slash, not a dash! – DarkGlow (talk) 08:57, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

It's not an EP. Singles nearly always had two tracks, some more. The Wikipedia article for EP says four or five tracks. It doesn't matter what "Playbill" called it. It Playbill called it a strawberry would it be one, haha. Sirhissofloxley (talk) 19:10, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]