Talk:Bluegrass Companies

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 September 2017. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama articles

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Comments[edit]

This is a local company from where I am from, could really be a good page, I used to work for them and man have they done some cool stuff. Let's try and make this more historical and get away from all the marketing sounding stuff, the history itself is good enough.

Notability[edit]

This is an encyclopedia, not a collection of every bit of fact possible (Please see WP:NOT). To that end, there are notability guidelines (Please see WP:GNG) that are used to decide what merits an article and what does not. This company is not notable. Ifnord (talk) 00:46, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Care to make an argument against the company's sources that have them responsible for assisting the removal of the first fusion reactor and much much more? rather than just state your opinion with no substance ? if you are going to come after this company perhaps at least make a non high school style i don't personally find it notable argument. --208.111.114.126 (talk) 17:07, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't care to make an argument. And I will not attack the style of your writing. What I will do is answer you civilly when I can. There is no way to prove a negative, (see Russell's teapot) therefore I cannot "prove" this company is not notable except to point out the guidelines for notability and state that I do not believe it meets them. The onus is then on the subject to prove it does meet the criteria. It appears you have very strong feelings for this subject; I have none. Please remember that this is neither an attack on you nor the company itself. It might very well be a very nice place to work, but that's not in question here. Ifnord (talk) 17:22, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I respect your stance and much of what you have said however, you still have not addressed how the sources cited in the article are not of note? please address the question mr. Ifnord, "I do not believe it meets them" is not going to be a satisfying level of insight. Also if the article must be deleted at least express how in the future what could make it relevant enough to try again? --208.111.114.126 (talk) 19:20, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also just watch some of the videos on their page https://www.facebook.com/Bluegrasscompanies/ it is honestly interesting stuff, maybe it is not notable but I would really like to understand why if not, and I understand facebook is not a source just figured it may be interesting to understand what they do... I have read the notability page and I have not seen where this is not notable as they are reference in more than 3 scholarly works published by the gov websites where they are not a casual mention but part of the team that yielded the information the whole articles are on, I worked with them at the time. --208.111.114.126 (talk) 19:36, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also sorry the high school comment was uncalled for, I apologize for that, and thanks for being civil. --208.111.114.126 (talk) 19:42, 15 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]