Talk:Blueprint (Ferry Corsten album)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Blueprint (Ferry Corsten album) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Electronic music Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Electronic music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Electronic music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Electronic musicWikipedia:WikiProject Electronic musicTemplate:WikiProject Electronic musicelectronic music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled[edit]

The Wikipedia page for Ferry Corsten's 6th album. Feel free to edit and adjust as necessary!

ANode (talk) 06:46, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Narrative sypnosis section[edit]

@Sergecross73: Hello. About the sypnosis area that was recently removed, I would like to clarify that the story's source came from this website, which appears to be a reliable source: 'https://duckduckgo.com/?q=blueprint+ferry+corsten+story&t=hg&ia=web' [The second link at the Trancepodium website, I can't paste it directly here as it's blocked], and was not of original research. I couldn't put it as a citation though as Wikipedia unknowingly blacklisted that site and it was blocked when I tried to cite it, thus I will try to appeal to get it whitelisted. An alternative reference has been put up to cite the sypnosis, which was Blueprint's official website, as the narrative for each track was included in there. But it's definitely a lacklustre primary source.

As for the length, I agree that it's a bit too long for a summary. So if resubmission of the text is allowed, I'll do my best to shorten it even further, with your supervision of the page.

May I ask for your permission to resubmit the section with a better reference and to decrease the text length? I believe that the narrative sypnosis section would benefit this article as Blueprint is a concept-based album with a story, therefore the story should be known to readers of this page. Thanks. aNode (discuss) 05:38, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In theory, yes, it's completely fine to have a "Themes/Lyrical Themes/Concept" type section in an article, especially for a concept album. But it needs to be entirely sourced, and written as an encyclopedic manner. It should not sound like a transcript or an informal retelling of it like that. I'm unfamiliar with Trancepodium, but as long as its blacklisted by Wikipedia, is safe to assume that it's not a reliable or usable source to be writing according to on Wikipedia. It also should be far shorter. Look at something like The Wall as far as how to do it right. Sergecross73 msg me 14:49, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]