This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Veganism and Vegetarianism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of veganism and vegetarianism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Veganism and VegetarianismWikipedia:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismTemplate:WikiProject Veganism and VegetarianismVeganism and Vegetarianism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
Per WP:BLP, we cannot make uncited personal claims of such things as birth date and birthplace. And any claims of being a first must be exceptionally well-sourced, per WP:EXCEPTIONAL. --Tenebrae (talk) 03:04, 22 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The new glamour image, added without discussion on 17:31, 22 August 2015 violates guidelines on infobox images, which say they should be forward-facing portraits without distracting background elements. In the new image, hair obscured most of her fact, which was pointed to the side. In you want an updated image, find one that meets guidelines. --Tenebrae (talk) 20:38, 13 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note I have no opinion on this, I was adding it upon a photosubmissions request directed through OTRS. Mdann52 (talk) 15:24, 14 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Since the image was reverted to one from 2009, it is not representative of Bonnie-Jill Laflin. An updated image, different from the one that was removed, has been submitted through Photo Submissions, but I can't seem to get it uploaded, even though it meets the infobox requirements, is owned by Bonnie-Jill Laflin, and license has been granted. Bonnie-Jill Laflin
File:Bonnie-Jill Laflin 2015 2.jpg certainly looks, in my opinion, to fulfill the infobox-image requirements. I haven't worked on an OTRS image in a while, so if @Mdann52: might like to do the honors? --Tenebrae (talk) 19:18, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia bios do not belong to the article subject, and glamorized, airbrushed, or otherwise manipulated promotional photos should be strongly disfavored. The 2009 image is perfectly appropriate. The 2015 image is not an improvement in any way except recency and, given that it has no background, is clearly an artifice of some sort. I therefore believe the 2009 image should be preferred here. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 19:42, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure shooting in front of a plain surface or a piece of seamless mean "artifice" — that's standard portrait photography, and there's no rule that we have to use candid snapshots only. As a matter of fact, the lack of background makes it a better image than otherwise since there's no distracting clutter. And if we're talking artifice, this image certainly shows less makeup than the previous image did. --Tenebrae (talk) 22:37, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
