Talk:Borealonectes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Consider adding a little more context[edit]

The intro is pretty heavy on the latin jargon, even for me. Also no estimated fossil date is given.PB666 yap 02:41, 12 July 2008 (UTC) Also in the text it says "Named in 2008 by Sato and Wu," but the references gives Sate . . .and Wu.[reply]

I can't do much about the taxonomy, as there aren't generally accepted common names for these groups, but I can address the other things. J. Spencer (talk) 02:50, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]