Talk:Boston Conservatory at Berklee

United States: Massachusetts Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Massachusetts portal This article is supported by WikiProject Massachusetts (assessed as Low-importance).

Classical music

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles

Higher education

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education articles

Composers on faculty[edit]

Hello, to the person who added Shoenberg and Sessions as former faculty members, what is your evidence for this? Badagnani 18:18, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

To-do list[edit]

What's stated in the to-do list (that there are few articles that link to Boston Conservatory is not true--there are many articles that link to it. Badagnani 23:20, 11 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that was a weird byproduct of the to-do list being created as an article (it's supposed to be a talk page). I've removed that part. --W.marsh 00:23, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

BoCo[edit]

Is there any way to make a link to Boco (disambiguation) when, and only when, people are rerouted to Boston Conservatory from Boco? It seems like there has to be a better way than having an explanation line at the top of the article for everyone to see. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.30.100.59 (talk) 00:49, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No. Reinstated. - CrazyRussian talk/email 01:14, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The simple answer is to ensure that Boco and BoCo both link direct to Boco (disambiguation), rather than here. No articles use Boco or BoCo to link here, so this would seem the entirely correct approach. (Anyway, I added the original line after I tried using search to find the two railway-related BoCo articles and ended up here instead!)

EdJogg 01:50, 18 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just to complete the story. There is a current Wikiproject to replace unnecessary instances of pages called 'xxxxx (disambiguation)', where the redirected page can be used instead. I found Boco listed there and requested an admin to resolve the issue. This is why Boco (disambiguation) is appearing in red, as of today.

Regards EdJogg 13:13, 25 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Berklee cafe[edit]

So the snooty musical theater girls and dancers no longer have to suffer the Berklee Beach? —Malber (talk • contribs) 20:38, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Bostonconservatory.gif[edit]

Image:Bostonconservatory.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 02:49, 1 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Number of Students[edit]

I recently updated the number of students to 700, and it was changed back to 525. The correct number is actually 702, which includes 512 undergraduates and 190 Graduate students, as per The Boston Conservatory's Office of Admissions. (I work in the marketing office at the Conservatory.) I've changed it to 702, and I'll add a breakdown of undergrad/grad and a breakdown by division. Agutowski (talk) 15:47, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Advertisement[edit]

While I appreciate whoever went through and added so much detailed information, I regret that I had to remove most of it as it seemed to have been written as an attempt to draft a catalog for the Conservatory. Please remember that Wikipedia does not serve as an advertisement for either the Boston Conservatory or any other organization. Pianoguy (talk) 03:11, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Problem with admissions statistics[edit]

When one follows the link for citation [2] to US News and World report, the listed admissions rate is 34%, not 100%. Where is this 100% thing from? 65.96.161.79 (talk) 02:31, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Updating old information[edit]

This article contained quite a bit of outdated information. The organization changed it's name years ago, but this article hadn't been updated. Their logo also changed, and hopefully the new version can be uploaded: The current logo doesn't reflect their name change. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benitag (talk • contribs) 14:16, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]