Talk:Brady House (baseball)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 15 April 2022[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 05:04, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


– This is the only title on this site known as "Brady House". The disambiguation page is mostly made up of a few things that don't have articles, and partial title matches. Is there any evidence of something like McCord-Brady Company and Brady Memorial Chapel being called "Brady House"? I don't see it. The closest is Brady-Brady House, but I don't think that a single house is known much, much less called "Brady House". --Quiz shows 21:31, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • You didn't mention The Brady house. Whether something is a separate article or a subtopic within another article doesn't really matter. —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 00:02, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. There are eleven entries listed upon the Brady House disambiguation page, with the 18-year-old baseball player depicted at the top, although there is no indication that his renown throughout the English-speaking world is at such a high level that it overshadows the combined notability of the remaining ten entries. —Roman Spinner (talkcontribs) 03:15, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose fails "Brady House" test in Gbooks In ictu oculi (talk) 11:35, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose per the two above opposes and especially since this page should probably be merged into Nationals prospects anyway. SportingFlyer T·C 15:12, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose (disclaimer as the creator of this article) It's too wide a term currently. Although I'd argue against the sentiment above about merging as GNG is clearly met. Best, GPL93 (talk) 05:49, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.