Talk:Brazil–Portugal relations

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

To do[edit]

Elements:

  • resident representatives

*nationals of the other country

  • treaties
  • common memberships in multilateral organizations

Topics to cover: *history

    • date of recognition
  • diplomatic and consular representations and representatives (embassies, consulates)
  • cultural and scientific cooperation
  • non-governmental actors
  • trade volumes
  • state visits
  • bilateral agreements and treaties

*nationals resident in the other country, migration between the two countries

Sources:

  • academia
  • directories of representations
  • trade, population statistics
  • studies on immigration/emigration
  • news reports on state visits
  • corpus of treatiesLihaas (talk) 18:09, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Lihaas, I think that the list you came up with is a good start on the topics that we need to work on for this article. A good article for us to compare with is the United Kingdom – United States relations, due to the similarities between UK-US relations and PT-BR relations. There is a lot of information out there about Portuguese-Brazilian relations, although most of them are written in Portuguese - so it will need to be translated. As soon as I have some free time I will start working on some of these topics. Hopefully, some more editors will join us in editing this article. Limongi (talk) 20:34, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I dont speak portuguese so ill have to stick to the english sources, shouldnt be that hard. We can get a higher profile if we nominate for DYK, but it needs a slightly bigger expansion in the next couple of days.Lihaas (talk) 22:27, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources[edit]

While on the lookout for expansion, i thought id leave a note for sources in the table.Lihaas (talk) 22:34, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Need the consular info and visitation [1][2]Lihaas (talk) 03:22, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Brazil–Portugal relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:28, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Brazil–Portugal relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:16, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]