Talk:Brazil–United States cotton dispute

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Trade Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trade, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Trade on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TradeWikipedia:WikiProject TradeTemplate:WikiProject TradeTrade articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2015. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Manhattanville College/International Trade (Spring 2015)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

Hi everyone, I will be working on this article for my International Trade class! I plan on making edits regarding the effect of the subsidies on cotton farmers of the immediate countries, the immediate cause and effect of the dispute, and how the dispute is settled. Thanks!

This article was the subject of an educational assignment in Spring 2015. Further details were available on the "Education Program:Manhattanville College/International Trade (Spring 2015)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki.

These are some of the articles that I will be drawing my information from: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2014/10/12/why-the-deal-to-pay-brazil-300-million-just-to-keep-u-s-cotton-subsidies-is-bad-for-the-wto-poor-countries-and-u-s-taxpayers/ https://www.organicconsumers.org/old_articles/clothes/224subsidies.php http://cip.cornell.edu/DPubS?service=UI&version=1.0&verb=Display&handle=dns.gfs/1200428204 http://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2014/10/16/obama-administration-cuts-expensive-deal-with-brazil-over-cotton-subsidies/ http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-10-01/u-s-reaches-deal-with-brazil-ending-cotton-trade-dispute http://www.wsj.com/articles/brazil-u-s-cotton-pact-will-reduce-export-subsidy-program-1412188276 http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2011/01/26/131192182/cotton http://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2013/jun/04/us-farm-bill-reduced-cotton-subsidies http://www.foxbusiness.com/markets/2014/10/01/us-and-brazil-resolve-decade-long-trade-fight-over-cotton-subsidies/

Charissa Michelel (talk) 17:44, 31 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think you've done a great job adding onto this article, you've shed a lot of light onto the topic. I think you address all aspects of the trade conflict adequately I am really impressed with this article. I think you achieved all the goals you set out to meet in this article. I like the settlement section that you put in as to what they did to rectify the situation. Very good job! Jamescz94 — Preceding undated comment added 10:01, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]