Talk:British Orienteering Federation

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the British Orienteering Federation article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Orienteering (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Orienteering, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OrienteeringWikipedia:WikiProject OrienteeringTemplate:WikiProject OrienteeringOrienteering articles

United Kingdom Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Table of Associations - include or exclude?[edit]

ARBAY has added a table of Associations to this article. His comment was placed on my talk page but I have moved it here. Twiceuponatime (talk) 09:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just done some more work on BOF and wondered what you think? 安東尼 TALK ^圣诞快乐 23:29, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure about the table. It is correct, but I don't think it is the job of wikipedia to provide that sort of detail. More the job of BOF. The original bit about 13 associations was sufficient for OUR readers. I would like it centred, if you know how to do that. Twiceuponatime (talk) 14:37, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

On reflection I think the table is wrong. Wikipedia should be providing details of the structure of BOF e.g. the original bit about 13 associations, but not the details – that is the responsibility of BOF itself at their website. I think the table should be removed, but I don’t feel sufficiently strong enough about it to do it. I have moved the comments here to see what opinion others have. Twiceuponatime (talk) 09:45, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think the table is useful and also I have centred the table. Regards 安東尼 TALK ^圣诞快乐 20:14, 12 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on British Orienteering Federation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:02, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]