Talk:Bronopol

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled[edit]

The external link below this article to furrental.com contradicts the statement "Liberated formaldehyde is not responsible for the biological activity associated with Bronopol". Joeylawn 03:05, 15 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Math[edit]

The article claims that 0.0025 is equal to 25 parts in a million. Surely it's 25 parts in ten-thousand? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 81.77.207.114 (talkcontribs) .

It says 0.0025 per cent. One per cent is one part in a hundred, so 0.0025 per cent is 25 parts in a million, as it says. —Keenan Pepper 15:08, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hello i suffer from a reaction to bronopol and need a produce list of products that contain broponol please can you help me?

Animated gif[edit]

isn't there a non-animated gif of this chemical? the animated version is rather distracting.

Henna (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia does not appear to be in an encyclopedic style[edit]

Applications[edit]

This article cites a poor source for the following:

This ingredient has been restricted for use in cosmetics in Canada.[2]

http://www.goodguide.com/ingredients/50954-bromo-nitropropane-diol

If you look at that link I wouldn't say it is a very reliable source.

Updated citation to reference to Health Canada website which contains the statement on restriction of use in Canada. DferDaisy (talk) 00:50, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decomposition[edit]

What means "very low levels of formaldehyde" are released? How is the stoichiometric ratio? 1 formaldehyde per 1 decaying Bronopol? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.140.90.18 (talk) 11:30, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Bronopol. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 23:58, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Checked bot update, no errors found, changed status to true per bot request. DferDaisy (talk) 01:36, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Added source for anti-microbial effectiveness claim[edit]

I added a source for the claim of Bronopol's effectiveness against bacteria, but it's about 40 years old and was paid for by the Boots company, so there may be a better source out there. --Alan Trick (talk) 23:23, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added WikiProject Pharmacology tag[edit]

I added a tag for WikiProject Pharmacology, since bronopol is approved in the EU for the prevention and treatment of fungal infections in fish (and has an MRL for fish). DferDaisy (talk) 01:08, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Percentage Weight-by-volume?[edit]

What does "% w/v" mean? Units are required for that to make any sort of sense. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AI0867 (talkcontribs) 11:15, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]