Talk:Bunker Spreckels
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
External links modified[edit]
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Bunker Spreckels. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140108162925/http://www.carvemag.com/2011/02/surfings-greatest-legend-bunker-spreckels/ to http://www.carvemag.com/2011/02/surfings-greatest-legend-bunker-spreckels/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:40, 10 November 2016 (UTC)
Very few facts[edit]
This article appears to have been written by either a fan, someone who knew this subject, or someone who was perhaps a friend of a friend. There are very few facts here that are appropriate encyclopedia content. This article is more of a stub and needs a lot of work. The content that was here was written in conversational style and quotations were used to simply add mass to the article. It appears that this subject's family is noteworthy and should be the ones to have Wikipedia articles. Perhaps they do. As for this subject, very little information exists that has been published by reputable third-party sources. All the best to all of you. MarydaleEd (talk) 23:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)