Talk:Céline Gounder

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Cb31337.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 19:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

notes[edit]

minor detail you could maybe fix: For the personal life section there was a repetitive use of "currently" . Also for the published research articles section, when you say things like "listed as second author of ten" do the listings of authors signify the amount of author contribution to the article? I think maybe clarifying that would be helpful. But other then that I think you did a great job Lee.ji (talk) 18:11, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


It may be beneficial if you added some of Dr. Gounder's major projects and awards to the lead section. This might help extend the introductory information a reader can take in. This way, the lead section can include the most important information about Dr. Gounder. It may be hard to find the early life information, so make sure the sources are reliable. The education section is very well done, the early life section should mirror this in terms of how it is written. For the awards section, it may help to give each award its own paragraph where you can expand on how and why she got a certain award if they are significant enough. Dsnu (talk) 17:36, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

____ Courtney, Good work on this so far! There are some sections where you have yet to expand, but they are identified, so I am confident that you will do well when it comes to populating those sections. There are some minor things that I would recommend fixing--for example, refer to Gounder by her last name throughout (not Celine) and it is not necessary to indicate what number author she was on particular papers. I would also agree with your classmate that suggested maybe mentioning one of the major awards in the lead section to indicate Dr. Gounder's significance and "notability" by Wikipedia standards. Make sure too that you add references to the points you make (even after referencing her professional appointments in the lead section). Amyc29 (talk) 22:29, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • This was awful. Contained fraudulent references as well as being extremely promotional. Jytdog (talk)

Please revise[edit]

Wikipedia articles summarize what other sources say.

Joe Biden is not yet President Elect. Lawsuits are not yet resolved. Recounts and audits are not complete. No states have yet certified any votes. Please remove this political bias.

We don't do stuff as you did in User:Cb31337/sandbox#News_Articles, where we go find papers or articles and describe them ourselves. That is not what we do here. We summarize what independent (not by the article subject) sources say. Please revise accordingly.

If you want an example, please see Steven M. Paul. Jytdog (talk) 18:58, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]