Talk:CHCA-TV

Canada: Alberta Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Alberta.

Television: Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Fair use rationale for Image:Rdtv.jpg[edit]

Image:Rdtv.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:23, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:RD-TV.gif[edit]

Image:RD-TV.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 03:28, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:CHTV1.svg[edit]

Image:CHTV1.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:47, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:CHTV2.svg[edit]

Image:CHTV2.svg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:49, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Broadcasts in Calgary[edit]

The wording in this article is a little confusing. It suggests that in 2005 CHCA was denied an application to broadcast in Calgary/Edmonton, but this later changed. But I've been watching the channel (and its RDTV predecessor) since the early 1990s on cable in Calgary. It's been available here for years. Or is this meant to mean non-cable, over-the-air broadcasts? Maybe it needs a little tweaking but I'm not familiar enough with the history of CHCA to make this change myself. 68.146.41.232 (talk) 13:16, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Having just come across information about this television station, I have tried to view it in Calgary. I do not have a cable connection and from the description I thought that it was being broadcast on channel 44. After spending some time looking at nothing but TV snow, I have to conclude that this channel is not being broadcast here in Calgary. If anyone has more detailed information then it should be added to the main article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mcconkeyb (talk • contribs) 06:34, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CITV transmitter[edit]

So according to Emarsee, he thinks that the CITV-TV-1 Red Deer transmitter of Global Edmonton is airing 2.5 hrs of RD programming a week. Problem is that his reference, a CRTC license, says "as a condition of licence, the Commission requires the following undertakings to broadcast no less than seven hours of local programming in each broadcast week". 7 is not 2.5, and this would have been a requirement from when the license started when CHCA was still broadcasting, so it wasn't in response to its closure. There's nothing I can find anywhere saying they're doing what Emarsee says, not even his own source. I'm wondering if "local" can mean "Edmonton" and not "Red Deer"? Regardless there's zero evidence they're actually doing that, and WP policy requires some before it can be in the article. Emarsee, where did you originally hear this info:

Canwest will continue to operate a [[semi-satellite]] of Edmonton's Global station [[CITV-TV|CITV]] in Red Deer, with 2.5 hours of local programming a week.<ref>[http://www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2009/2009-409.htm] Decision CRTC 2009-401</ref>

Note I deleted the link to the old, expired license. --208.38.59.163 (talk) 21:14, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Look in CITV-1's application, 2009-0104-2. Haven't looked through it, but try the schedule that's always included in the schedule. єmarsee • Speak up! 00:08, 24 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on CHCA-TV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:12, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]