This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
CMLL World Mini-Estrellas Championship is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling articles
10 references? Seriously? Completely ridiculous. A featured list should be the "most and best lists, well-referenced by multiple sources", not this. By far. No motivation to start a demote process, but this is completely out-of-range for "featured list". Tisquesusa (talk) 23:03, 16 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"Lo mejr de la lucha ilbre mexicana durante el 2003" doesn't look like terribly good Spanish. Siuenti (씨유엔티) 01:18, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Exacty. Same for "Super Luchas" vs "SuperLuchas". Bad review done. Tisquesusa (talk) 01:23, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm wondering if "mejr" and "ilbre" are the actual words which appeared in this "reliable" source, or are just typos from someone perhaps not terribly competent at Spanish. Siuenti (씨유엔티) 01:27, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oh no a typo on the internet, fixed. MPJ-DK 02:07, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"Oh no, a typo or two nor I, nor the reviewers spotted in one of the very 'best' out of more than 5 million articles on this specific website", lets be complete and honest here... Tisquesusa (talk) 02:31, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
A typo is a typo and should be fixed by a Wikipedian wherever it is found Tisquesusa, missed by me, the reviwers and anyone who's looked at the article since the source was introduced. So I fixed the issue, if you want to assign blame you can go ahead and blame me for fat fingering a title if that helps you in any way. MPJ-DK 03:34, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Were they your typos or the source's typos, @MPJ-DK:? Siuenti (씨유엔티) 02:40, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Again in defensive mode, MPJ-DK... It is an example of your sloppiness. Something featured needs to be (near-)perfect. The fact it isn't at start, is not a shame. The fact it isn't AFTER review, is. Tisquesusa (talk) 04:23, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
In how many articles did you make the same "fat finger typo typos"? Siuenti (씨유엔티) 04:39, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
