This article is part of WikiProject Argentina, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Argentina. If you would like to participate, you can improve Cadet scandal, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ArgentinaWikipedia:WikiProject ArgentinaTemplate:WikiProject ArgentinaArgentine articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Latin America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Latin AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Latin AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Latin AmericaLatin America articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBT studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBT-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBT studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBT studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBT studiesLGBT articles
This article was created or improved during Wiki Loves Pride, 2021.Wiki Loves PrideWikipedia:Wiki Loves PrideTemplate:Wiki Loves Pride talkWiki Loves Pride articles
A fact from Cadet scandal appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 July 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:27, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Página/12 (in Spanish). Quote: "The incident that became a homosexual hunt and became famous as the cadet scandal was only known by the newspapers of the time and by elusive witnesses (...). The alleged charge of corruption of minors was a subterfuge to hide the persecution of gays. (...) it was a homosexual hunt." ("El hecho que devino cacería homosexual y pasó a la celebridad como el escándalo de los cadetes solo se conocía por los periódicos de la época y por testigos esquivos. (...) Se alegaba supuesto cargo de corrupción de menores pero era un subterfugio para esconder la persecución a los gays. (...) era una cacería homosexual")
Página/12 (in Spanish). Quote: "Of all the versions of the 1942 Great Raid, which actually appears to have been not one but several raids..." ("De todas las versiones de la Gran Razzia de 1942, que en realidad parece que fueron no uno sino varios allanamientos")
Infobae (in Spanish.) Quote: "'The cadet scandal': the story of a great homosexual hunt in Argentina." ("'El escándalo de los cadetes': la historia de una gran cacería homosexual en la Argentina")
Overall: Article is well written, very in-depth and well-sourced. The hook is properly cited and interesting, I'm assuming good faith on all offline and/or Spanish sources. This was obviously a historically significant and well-documented event so I feel comfortable with that. I noticed a few minor typos and corrected them, but it's a solid article besides. Earwig did not pick up any copyvio. QPQ is not needed as nominator has fewer than 5 DYK credits. BuySomeApples (talk) 01:16, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"Goodwin was apprehend the same day as his friend," → "Goodwin was apprehended the same day as his friend"
Done
"the age of majority until July—which was 22 years old at the time—" ((right arrow)) "the age of majority (which, at the time, was 22 years old) until July"
Putting on hold for now to allow nominator to address comments. Feel free to ping me with questions. — GhostRiver 19:18, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
GhostRiver, thank you for taking a look. I've made the corrections. Let me know if everything's ok! --ℜ𝔲𝔪𝔟𝔞 𝔖𝔞𝔪𝔟𝔞 𝔐𝔞𝔪𝔟𝔬 🌠 (talk) 18:31, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Looks great now, happy to pass! — GhostRiver 18:36, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
.svg)
Article is well written, very in-depth and well-sourced. The hook is properly cited and interesting, I'm assuming good faith on all offline and/or Spanish sources. This was obviously a historically significant and well-documented event so I feel comfortable with that. I noticed a few minor typos and corrected them, but it's a solid article besides. Earwig did not pick up any copyvio. QPQ is not needed as nominator has fewer than 5 DYK credits. BuySomeApples (talk) 01:16, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
