Talk:Call My Name (Cheryl song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleCall My Name (Cheryl song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 7, 2013Good article nomineeListed

Unprotect[edit]

The song has now been released and charted, so why hasn't it been created? Unreal7 (talk) 21:30, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Release is irrelevant. Where has it charted?? Aaron You Da One 17:01, 11 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Never mind. The page has already been created under Call My Name (Cheryl song). Unreal7 (talk) 16:43, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
How can this page be unprotected? Someone just redirected the article above to this one, and this one is protected until August 24. - Saulo Talk to Me 17:45, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
A request for unprotection has been submitted. --Shadow (talk) 17:56, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This page should be brought back surely because it has been released. Most song pages are brought back on release week. For some reason this has not? It is also due to chart at #1 in Ireland tomorrow and the UK on Sunday. It would surely be best to recover the page now? Bbbnbbb (talk) 11:31, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. I already have the article ready to roll. - Saulo Talk to Me 17:24, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
It has been unprotected and created! - Saulo Talk to Me 18:23, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Call My Name (Cheryl Cole song)[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Call My Name (Cheryl Cole song)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "ire":

  • From Girls Aloud discography: "Irish Charts > Girls Aloud". irish-charts.com Hung Medien. Retrieved 2011-04-23.
  • From Cheryl Cole discography: "Irish Charts > Cheryl Cole". irish-charts.com Hung Medien. Retrieved 2010-04-15.
  • From Rita Ora: "Rita Ora - Irish Charts". irish-charts.com/ Hung Medien.
  • From Calvin Harris discography: "Irish Charts > Calvin Harris". irish-charts.com Hung Medien. Retrieved 2010-09-24.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 01:23, 21 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned references in Call My Name (Cheryl Cole song)[edit]

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Call My Name (Cheryl Cole song)'s orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "ire":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 14:14, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Call My Name (Cheryl Cole song)/GA1

Problems[edit]

I am completely baffled at how this article was passed as a GA with multiple factual and grammatical errors in existence. Here are the ones I saw:

  • "Call My Name" achieve commercial success
    I have rephrased it, take a look. Do you have any sugestions? - Saulo Talk to Me 12:25, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    You didn't need to rephrase it, just added the d to "achieve" so it's achieved. It was a grammatical error. Till 12:47, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    lol Sorry. - Saulo Talk to Me 13:09, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The song did not reach number one in Poland, that was the video chart and NOT the official Polish Singles chart.
    minus Removed - Saulo Talk to Me 12:25, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    It's not like a video chart needs mentioning for the song anyway. Till 12:47, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • That composition section contains various critique that has mostly nothing to do with the actual composition of the song.
    Which ones? The one about the track's title? Other than that they all seem about the composition to me. - Saulo Talk to Me 12:25, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Well there are many 'x of y stated this' and 'x of y described...' Till 12:47, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    But there are many articles like this: S&M, Déjà Vu, Do Somethin'... - Saulo Talk to Me 13:09, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The Australian chart has a full top 100 placement, although ARIA only releases the top 50. To state that the song debuted and peaked at number 49 is therefore an inaccuracy.
    I did not know about this. However, how can we know that it stayed on the top 100 after that 49 position? I can rephrase it saying that it stayed on the top 50 for one week. - Saulo Talk to Me 12:27, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry? It's still wrong , it didn't debut at number 49. Till 12:47, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    I think it's best if you just write 'Call my name peaked at number 49 on the Austr.....' unless you can't find the top 100. Till 12:49, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
     Fixed - Saulo Talk to Me 13:09, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • A Twitter reference is not very impressive, perhaps finding a third-party reliable source about the issue?
    The source is from The Huffington Post. - Saulo Talk to Me 12:25, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Some of the publishers are wrong. Till 12:18, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Which ones? - Saulo Talk to Me 12:25, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    The ones for Digital spy, The Guardian, etc. etc. Till 12:47, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Guardian News and Media redirect to Guardian Media Group, so I made it this way Guardian News and Media. Take a look. - Saulo Talk to Me 13:09, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    Guardian Media Group is the owner, not the publisher. Also for Digital Spy, it's Hearst Magazines. Till 13:59, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
     Fixed - Saulo Talk to Me 14:39, 7 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Call My Name (Cheryl song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:24, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]