Talk:Callington/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Why is the re-election of one Mebyon Kernow councillor worthy of note? I will remove this, unless some significance can be given.Serpren (talk) 09:13, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
There's been no objection, nor interest, so I'll remove it.Serpren (talk) 03:02, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Callington, Cornwall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140729194902/http://www.magakernow.org.uk/pdf/placename_masterlist.pdf to http://www.magakernow.org.uk/pdf/placename_masterlist.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:29, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
Requested move 14 February 2019
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: moved (closed by non-admin page mover) SITH (talk) 16:24, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
– the town in England is the original and has over 9x the population, in addition Australian settlements apparently have the state as part of the name. Move the DAB to Callington (disambiguation). Crouch, Swale (talk) 15:13, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:36, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Crouch, Swale: Is the original Callington the dominant meaning? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:37, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support per nom. The English town also gets more than 70% of page views. PC78 (talk) 00:28, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Weak oppose. The English town does get the most views, but I don't see that it's consistently getting more than all other Callington topics combined[1] (though it's not far off). Until it's clearer that it meets the requirement, it's preferable to retain the current title for clarity. ╠╣uw [talk] 11:11, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- I count 1234 for Cornwall (Callington, Cornwall, Callington (UK Parliament constituency), Callington railway station, Callington Community College, Callington Town F.C.) per WP:DABCONCEPT these topics refer to the town. But I count 764 for others (Callington, South Australia, Callington Mill, Tasmania, Callington Road Hospital, Bristol) [[2]]. I has assumed that all the other topics referred to either the town in Cornwall or South Australia but given that there are PTMs in other places that may make a weaker case for the Cornish town to be primary. Crouch, Swale (talk) 12:02, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- In regards to DABCONCEPT, we may be interpreting it differently; per my own reading of the guideline, it doesn't mean that everything sharing a similar name or location to a thing counts together toward it, particularly if they're all different kinds of things (as indeed these are). Again I'm not strongly opposed, but I feel per TITLECHANGES that before undertaking a change to a stable article title, we'd need to establish more than just borderline/equivocal primacy as the basis for the move. ╠╣uw [talk] 18:10, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support From interest in these pages that have this title, and not other titles. --Quiz shows 21:01, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support as above. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:25, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.