Talk:Camelot Property Management

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Squatting Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Squatting, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of squatting on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SquattingWikipedia:WikiProject SquattingTemplate:WikiProject Squattingsquatting articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent.

Proposed for deletion[edit]

Proposed for Deletion as this is advertising for the company. There seems to be no notable interest for this article to exist.— Preceding unsigned comment added by AliHog (talk • contribs) 17:29, 21 December 2010

Hello AliHog, the secondary sources show that the company is notable, and I tried to keep a neutral tone and my intention was not to promote this company. Do you have any specific criticisms or suggestions? Perhaps with your interest in this area, you know of more critical sources we could use to improve the article. Grim²³ ★ 22:27, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The reason for my request was based on the nature of the information you disclose. The article includes costings and what could be interpreted as a "pricing structure" which then suggests that it is advertising. It may be advisable to remove the monetary values but still include that occupiers pay fees. This would also save on editing as, presumably, these costings must change regularly as Camelot are an active business. I also picked up on the tone of the last line. It seems to suggest that Camelot provide other services but then gives no details on these services. There seems to be no reason for mentioning the services unless for the specific purpose of advertising that they exist. It may be worthwhile providing more information on these other services to justify why they are notable.

I hope this is helpful. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AliHog (talk • contribs) 10:11, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You're quite right, (Wikipedia is not a directory #5) I've removed the prices and changed "traditional security services" to "security guards". (Btw, type ~~~~ after your posts to sign and time stamp your comment) Grim²³ ★ 13:51, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]