Talk:Canadian Air Transport Security Authority

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Canadian Air Transport Security Authority article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Aviation: Airports

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar and style: not checked Supporting materials: not checked	To fill out this checklist, please add the following code to the template call: \| b1<!--Referencing and citation--> = <yes/no> \| b2<!--Coverage and accuracy --> = <yes/no> \| b3<!--Structure --> = <yes/no> \| b4<!--Grammar and style --> = <yes/no> \| b5<!--Supporting materials --> = <yes/no> assessing the article against each criterion.

This article is supported by the airport project.

Canada: Governments Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Governments of Canada.

controversy[edit]

CATSA has been implicated by the Privacy commissioner of Canada for acting improperly. This has been referenced and has been cited properly. Please elaborate why this content was taken down. Similar, other government entities (and government contractors) have such sections added to their wiki pages. 207.34.115.64 (talk) 17:02, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Mission and vision statements unencyclopedic; lots of obvious, relevant content missing[edit]

What possible purpose does including the internal propaganda of a corporation or government agency, such as vision and mission statements, serve in a Wikipedia article? These are superficial horseshit created for the purpose of indoctrinating employees, they don't tell one anything (at least not without plenty of OR) an outsider would want to know.

Meanwhile, there is no mention of the insane measures they enacted in response to the failed attack of this past Christmas, to name just the most recent obviously-notable encyclopedic content that should be here but isn't. 24.78.210.79 (talk) 07:05, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]