Talk:Canon EOS-1D Mark II

Photography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Mark II N - new/old AA filter[edit]

My concern is about having a reliable source on this matter. Not about right or wrong. Unfortunately, the one source that actually claims that the AA filter is the same, is from an online chat forum. This is generally not an acceptable source, as there is little verifiability in the posters true identity, nor there claims. Also the long term reliably of the source is uncertain. The other two sources describe how one must post process to offset the AA filter, and default "picture styles", to regain sharpness. I do not not see anything that describes the Mk II N having same AA filter as Mk II. I should be clear, my intention is to have a reliable source. Wikipedia articles must have integrity, and the backbone of it, is good, solid, sources. So since there is not at this time a reliable source, for either situation, I'm going to delete this portion of the article, until a reliable source becomes available. Please discuss here if you disagree. Nebrot (talk) 03:51, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'll try to dig up an email address and get a clarification. --213.64.236.102 (talk) 21:26, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great! I'm sorry for starting a mini edit war there, I should have realized that there was also no valid source/proof for Mk II N having new AA filter. I got a little jumpy. I saw the error in my initial edit, and decided the best thing to do is remove any statement relating to this aspect of the camera. This is the rule of thumb in Wikipedia. It's better to have nothing, than something that can't be reliably sourced as fact. Post here if you find something. Nebrot (talk) 13:05, 3 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]