Talk:Canon EOS 5D Mark III

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Canon EOS 5D Mark III article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Photography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Timeline Classification Misleading[edit]

There is no such thing from Canon Range as: "Flagship, High End and Mid-Range". According to the website, there are 3 classifications, they are: Entry Level | Enthusiast | Professional

Mid range and high end are too subjective to classify cameras. I believe the Canon Website is the most reliable and most objective in classifying the timeline. I didn't create the table and I don't want to ruin it an get in trouble. May I request to the creator or someone who is knowledgeable to fix it.

Visit here: http://www.canon.com.au/For-You/EOS-Digital-SLR-Cameras D. Lau (talk) 10:03, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copied to Template talk:Canon DSLR cameras. GregorB (talk) 19:35, 31 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2 years later, I fixed it. I wish I would have seen this earlier. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.201.174.85 (talk) 11:37, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

uncompressed HD video[edit]

According to Canon, an April '13 firmware update will add uncompressed HD video and improve autofocus performance. SwineFlew? (talk) 05:09, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image removal[edit]

Velella, did you remove the image because you are unable to verify the type of camera. The credits in the source list the equipment used. There is only one still image camera on the list. There is also a video camera and a bunch of lenses.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 20:02, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cubesat[edit]

Canon created a cubesat based on this camera although it failed to reach orbit:

was apparently called CE-SAT 1B https://spaceflightnow.com/2020/10/28/rocket-lab-successfully-launches-satellites-for-planet-and-canon/ ©Geni (talk) 07:43, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]